New Issue of Studies in Vocation and Calling Explores Communal Frameworks for Vocation

This post celebrates the release of the most recent issue of Studies in Vocation and Calling. It opens by discussing the complexities of helping students, particularly first-generation college attendees, navigate their vocational paths amid personal interests, economic pressures, and family expectations. This example illustrates the need for educators to support communal frameworks of calling, reflecting on how societal forces impact students’ perceptions of vocation. These issues are foregrounded and explored by the various contributions in this issue as they develop more communal frameworks for vocational exploration.

young ethnic female student doing assignment with tutor in university
Photo by Kampus Production on Pexels.com

Several years ago, an advisee came into my office at the end of her first year of college. She had spent the first year reveling in her art and literature courses and was finally ready to declare her major. In what? In nursing, of course! We spent quite a bit of time working through the unavoidable reality that she would need to take a lot of science courses to pursue nursing—courses, mind you, she said she had absolutely no interest in. But nursing pays well (she needed to break a generational socio-economic cycle), and it involves caring for people (which she was good at and was important to her), and—perhaps above all—it was her mother’s clear expectation that she would become a nurse.

I have no doubt many readers—both at NetVUE member institutions and beyond—have experienced similar moments with their advisees. Conversations like these embody, in real time, the daily work of vocation, which is as complex and complicated as each individual student’s life. Yet the themes reflect the nearly universal needs of many of our students, especially those who are first-generation: in this student’s story we witness the uneasy intersection of interests and talents, personal commitments, economic realities, cultural narratives about worthy work, and family expectations. Helping students untangle and reweave these strands in ways that nurture their formation—and their hope for their own future—is a challenge faced collectively by those committed to educating for vocation. These advising conversations might take place in private with individual students, but the work of weaving together the larger tapestry of vocation on our campuses is a much more public endeavor, one that requires team effort.

The articles, reflections, and reviews in the Fall 2026 issue of Studies in Vocation and Calling all contribute to the collective task of accompanying our uniquely gifted and situated students in their vocational exploration and discernment. One important aspect of this “present work” emerges as a key theme across the issue’s offerings: specifically, the context of late-stage capitalism. Neoliberalism’s assumptions and values, alongside the concrete pressures of its economic outcomes, dominate contemporary Western society. Authors and reviewers in the issue examine various dimensions of this reality and analyze the impact of these forces on notions of vocation and calling, especially among traditional age undergraduate students (and their parents). Readers are invited to consider how educators and institutions can both equip students to navigate such forces and provide counternarratives that serve to expand their sense of calling into shapes that are more holistic and relational.

In fact, a second and related theme appears throughout the issue: namely, a strong emphasis on connection and mutual relation in a world of diverse beings and ways of being. Contributors offer alternatives to the Western figure of the autonomous individual on which neoliberalism relies and which, in turn, has shaped traditional Western conceptions of calling. In contrast, the issue’s contributors suggest a range of concepts and practices that emphasize the ecological, cultural, communal, and familial dimensions of calling. They not only point to the important role of the common good in vocational formation, but they also highlight that a person’s calling is always enmeshed within a web of relations that precedes and exceeds individual achievement or growth (however vital those may be). If there is consensus across this issue’s otherwise diverse offerings, it is that these more communal vocational frameworks play a vital role in widening the possibilities for flourishing in a world that does not distribute such possibilities equitably. You will also hear in the issue the shared conviction that giving students access to such frameworks empowers them to see and act upon those possibilities.

There are articles in this issue that will appeal to readers with varied interests in vocation. Rebecca Pruitt’s article on teacher education offers insight for all faculty members interested in incorporating vocational reflection into pre-professional programs that also must meet stringent accreditation standards. Brittany Anne Chozinski presents educators and institutions with a new model for vocation that attends to students’ complex relational and cultural lives: the mosaic restoration model. If philosophical and religious thought interests you, check out Jason Mahn’s piece on giftedness and an interdisciplinary roundtable on the role of bliss—or not!—in the called life. Readers will also find in the issue a theatrical performance that serves as a transformative site for advocacy and mentoring, an administrator’s reflection on her institution’s history and her place in it, and musings on the tedium of cyclical callings with an appeal to the Bible, the Buddha, and Hollywood. Book and resource reviews engage themes of choice, ambition, work that is “good enough,” generous leadership, the gifts of Mary Oliver’s poetry, and the virtues and pleasures of deep reading.

To access these articles online, visit the webpage for this issue of Studies in Vocation and Calling. For print copies, readers who are members of NetVUE can reach out to their Campus Contact.

Krista E. Hughes is NetVUE’s director of resource development. She is responsible for the development of print and digital resources for use throughout the NetVUE membership, such as the NetVUE conversation cards. She also serves as managing editor of the journal, Studies in Vocation and Calling. Krista teaches in the religious studies department at Wofford College in Spartanburg, South Carolina. She previously served as founding director of the Muller Center for Exploration & Engagement at Newberry College in Newberry, South Carolina, where she was also associate professor of religion.

Vocational Formation in the First Year: Realizing the Promise, Avoiding the Pitfalls

This post discusses the significance and challenges of vocational formation in the first-year college experience. While it recognizes the potential for students to start exploring and discerning their vocations, it also highlights the overwhelming uncertainties they face and the challenges in doing so. The authors propose three strategic priorities to enhance vocational programming, emphasizing foundational work and reflection.

The first post in a collaborative series on vocation in the first-year experience.

Looking back on our own first-year experiences as undergraduate students, all three of us recognize how easily our memories have been shaped by what came afterward. As Cynthia reflects on her first year (admittedly through rose-colored glasses), she recalls the lifelong friendships she formed, her growth as a writer, finding a home in a faith community, and—viewed now through the lens of a career in higher education—the first seeds of her vocation. What is easier to forget are the uncertainties that accompanied those experiences: wondering if friendships would come and questioning whether admission to a “stretch” school reflected genuine ability or simply legacy status. She also lacked a clear sense of academic direction, even spending a season as a political science major, a choice that now seems baffling in terms of vocational fit.

group of college student looking up on trees
Photo by RDNE Stock project on Pexels.com

Those of us who engage students in vocation can be guilty of wearing similarly colored glasses. As James Lang wryly notes in “The Myth of First-Year Enlightenment,” the faculty members most eager to build transformative first-year programming are often the very ones for whom early college was transformative, mistaking their own exceptional case for the norm. The first year often feels promising for robust vocational programming—a fresh start, an eager audience, and tangible touchpoints for engagement. Yet we sometimes overlook that first-year students are overwhelmed with big and difficult questions: whether they will make friends, whether they have what it takes to succeed, and whether they have chosen the right area of study. And we discount that these concerns are formidable distractions from the deep work required for vocational discernment.

Continue reading “Vocational Formation in the First Year: Realizing the Promise, Avoiding the Pitfalls”

Mentoring as Vocational Practice: Reflections on the NetVUE Regional Gathering at Presbyterian College

The NetVUE Regional Gathering at Presbyterian College emphasized the importance of mentorship in the context of experiential learning as a way to support students’ vocational exploration. Keynote speakers, Andy Chan and Terese Lund, encouraged participants to accompany students in discovering their purpose, asking good questions and providing space to sit with the uncertainty as part of their growth process. The gathering explored strategies for creating a supportive mentoring culture.

According to Terese Lund, “mentoring is the relational infrastructure for formation,” a definition she offered on the second day of the NetVUE Regional Gathering at Presbyterian College that took place September 24–26 in Clinton, South Carolina. The assistant vice president of Purposeful Pathways and professor of psychology at Wingate University, Lund drew on her experience as an administrator, faculty member, and mentor as she mapped out a few significant vocational frameworks for participants to consider. She then invited them to reflect on them as they explored the role of mentoring in experiential learning as a key part of vocational exploration and discernment for undergraduate students. As Lund argued, this process is one that students “should not have to do alone.”

The theme of this gathering was Vocational and Experiential Learning: The Call to Mentorship, which focused on this central question: “How does mentorship in experiential learning opportunities foster genuine vocational formation in students?”  Over the course of three days, participants examined the role that such opportunities play in student learning, sharing concrete practices that could deepen the mentoring culture on their own campuses—all with an emphasis on this work could shape students’ sense of purpose and calling.

Continue reading “Mentoring as Vocational Practice: Reflections on the NetVUE Regional Gathering at Presbyterian College”

Teaching King Lear: Choosing the Path of Most Resistance

This post on Vocation Matters takes up the question of how to help students navigate their multiple callings in multiple communities. They often don’t have experience working through this tension, which motivates the author to teach King Lear. When reading this play, students confront the tragic end of Cordelia, a character who is punished for her virtues rather than rewarded for them. Her death illustrates how living vocationally can often bring sacrifice and suffering. Teaching this Shakespearean play can help students grapple with narratives that disrupt their expectations and mature vocationally.

The third post in a series on Shakespeare, pedagogy, and the power of literature to help us navigate ambiguity.

It’s a regular occurrence, especially among students who are overcommitted and socially invested. They request an extension for what they assure me is a really good reason.

a woman holding a patient s hand
Photo by RDNE Stock project on Pexels.com

One student can’t finish her paper on time because her roommate is in the hospital, and she had to spend all night there, keeping watch over her friend.

Another asks for a make-up quiz because his girlfriend was, in his words, “having a rough time” and “needed to talk.”

I once had a student provide documentation that the geriatric dog she was pet-sitting had died and she had to handle the logistics.

If we assume (perhaps sometimes too generously) that these stories are true, then the students are right: They do have a very good reason. And they are fairly confident that if they just explain the context clearly enough, then I—their kind, nurturing, female professor—will show mercy. Because if they “had to” or “needed to” do something else truly meaningful, then the academic impact should surely be mitigated.

Continue reading “Teaching King Lear: Choosing the Path of Most Resistance”

Practicing Purpose and Joy: Vocational Discernment for Faculty Members

This post concludes a series on faculty thriving and highlights the importance of cultivating purpose and joy for faculty members in higher ed. Drawn from insights from the volume the authors edited, it suggests that flourishing requires a rethinking of purpose and joy as practices, not destination, as well as a supportive institutional culture to cultivate well-being and fulfillment.

A co-authored series on what faculty members need to thrive vocationally.

Last spring, we came across this image on Instagram (great oracle of wisdom that it is), posted by the Open Discovery Institute (ODIN), that summarized the “benefits of staying in academia after PhD.” Without putting too fine a point on it, the things that many of us might hope for (a fair salary, holistic wellbeing, good mental health, and vocational confidence in the future) were not included on the pie chart. In fact, as a close look at the chart suggests, it’s unclear what the actual benefits of remaining in higher education are. Compared to ODIN’s usual posts, which receive hundreds and sometimes a few thousand likes, this post received over 26,000. Clearly, it struck a chord.

As we conclude our series on pursuing purpose and joy as faculty members, we want to offer encouragement to our faculty colleagues in higher education, pushing back on the gallows humor that many academics, including ourselves, indulge in when we talk about our vocations. Our previous posts focused on faculty burnout, why our limitations are important, and how friendships help sustain us. Our final post reflects on cultivating purpose and joy.

Continue reading “Practicing Purpose and Joy: Vocational Discernment for Faculty Members”

Good Enough Faithfulness

This post highlights the pressure to achieve in higher education and offers an alternative to this mindset. It emphasizes the importance of embracing life’s messiness and acknowledging conflicting callings. Instead of striving for perfection, it suggests fostering gratitude and recognizing “good enough” actions to cultivate a meaningful vocation in different life seasons.

A series drawing on a therapist’s insights into play, wandering, and presence in relation to vocational exploration and discernment.

Humble callings upon an early rise, easy to cast aside.
The glory in a student’s struggle—how to uniquely guide?
A thoughtful intellectual, with time and curiosity to give,
An ideal image that often collides with how most of us actually live.
The simple truth is our lives are full, with care and needs each day.
How easy to critique, dismiss, and belittle the impact of our way.
The calling is not perfection and meeting every need,
The calling is rhythm, reflection, and goodness of the deed.

—Carrie Caudill

Achievement and optimization mindsets have become deeply ingrained in the culture of higher education. My own internal script often demands, “Go, go, go! Grade those papers. Make this class content more interactive. Don’t forget about applying for that grant proposal. Oh, and look on Amazon—your son needs a new lunch box. Don’t forget to respond to the Meal Train request, and the committee meeting is in 15 minutes, so you can do something in the 13 minutes before you log on to Teams. Go!”

scattered papers and broken pencils
Photo by Tara Winstead on Pexels.com
Continue reading “Good Enough Faithfulness”

What’s Your Purpose, When You Can’t Get out of Bed?

Lucille Clifton (Wikimedia Commons)

In her poem, “won’t you celebrate with me,” Lucille Clifton writes,

come celebrate
with me that everyday
something has tried to kill me
and has failed.

I first read these words when I was in college in the spring of 2012. Trayvon Martin had been killed, and I was sitting in a theology course on Genesis and Exodus, grappling with the fact that being a Black woman often meant not feeling safe in this world, in classrooms, and even in our bodies. At the time, the words made me deeply sad and, as my big cousin used to say when I was growing up, they “made my nerves bad.”

I didn’t truly embody these words or know their real impact until 2020. While everyone in the world was weathering the pandemic—during which over 300,000 people died in the United States alone—I was simultaneously struggling with challenges in my own body and navigating higher education as I held space for students whose stories were like mine. At that time, it felt almost impossible to support Black students exhausted from racial battle fatigue at a predominantly white institution. So much uncertainty and doubt played in my mind.

Continue reading “What’s Your Purpose, When You Can’t Get out of Bed?”

“It Changed My Life”: Centering Relationships in Communal Living

The Anne Devenney House at Fordham University provided young adults like Gina Ciliberto with transformative experiences through intentional living and community engagement. This inclusive environment fostered relationships, deepened purpose, and supported vocational exploration. Despite its closure due to financial reasons, the impact on residents’ lives and their ongoing connections highlights the value of such communities.

A series on the impact of intentional living communities on young adults as they explore and discern their vocations.

Gina Ciliberto lives in Yonkers, just blocks from the New York City borough she loves: the Bronx. In 2012, Gina graduated from Fordham University. During her sophomore and junior years, she lived at the Anne Devenney House, a university-sponsored, off-campus community that bridged the gap between students and their neighbors in the Bronx. Asked how the community impacted her, Gina simply said, “It changed my life.” 

Members of the Anne Devenney House community sharing a meal.

The Anne Devenney House began as a project of Fordham’s campus ministry. Although it didn’t require religious affiliation, all seven residents in the first year of this intentional community identified as Roman Catholic. Living together in a standalone house a few blocks from campus in a predominantly Latinx neighborhood, they committed to the three areas of the program: community service, campus outreach, and intentional community within the house. There were mandatory dinners together once a week, but they often shared meals informally.

Continue reading ““It Changed My Life”: Centering Relationships in Communal Living”

Moments of Annunciation: David Brooks

David Brooks discusses vocation as akin to falling in love, emphasizing emotional exploration and self-discovery. In the inaugural episode of this season of NetVUE’s podcast Callings, he shares insights on finding one’s calling by paying to attention to feelings of admiration, indignation, and enthusiasm, suggesting that deep self-awareness is essential for meaningful vocational discernment.

David Brooks

“Finding your calling,” David Brooks suggests, “is more like falling in love than it is like making a decision. It just happens to you.” One of the most recognized public intellectuals of our time, David is the featured guest in the first episode of season seven of NetVUE’s podcast Callings. In it, he reflects on the many ways he’s come to understand vocation and calling over the course of his life and career. Educators who work with undergraduate students will find much value in David’s experiences and storytelling.

For David, vocational exploration and discernment are rooted in our emotions and desires. His “main advice” to listeners, especially students, on how to live vocationally is “to fall in love with things” and to learn how to answer the question, “What do you really want?” This question might seem like a simple one to answer, yet it remains one of the most significant ones we need to ask ourselves; it can also be one of the hardest ones to answer authentically, given the self-awareness it requires. The question is important because, as David notes (drawing on the wisdom of one of his former professors), “what distinguishes people is the ruling passion of their souls.” To know a person—or a student—is not to reduce them to their GPA or their SAT scores, but to ask them, “What do you love?” In this way, “the most important quality to cultivate” in our lives is that of “being a good lover,” a quality that is central to vocational discernment. Ultimately, as David observes, the “process of discovering what you want is the process of finding your calling.”

Continue reading “Moments of Annunciation: David Brooks”

The Attention Gym II: Stretching to Listen

This post discusses enhancing students’ listening abilities through class discussions, emphasizing the contrast between dialogue and conversations that function more as disconnected monologues. It advocates for viewing the classroom as an “attention gym” to strengthen active listening skills, essential for vocational discernment. The text also highlights practices to promote a culture of attentive listening among students.

A series on how to help our students strengthen their abilities to pay attention to their lives, the world, and their vocations.

When I talk with students about the purposes of class discussion, I often show them the dinner scene from my favorite Sandra Bullock film, While You Were Sleeping. I ask them to describe what they observe about the quality of the conversation happening around the dinner table, and especially to note who seems to be listening. This scene helps us distinguish between dialogue, a method of building on each other’s ideas, and conversation that proceeds more like a set of disconnected monologues (however humorous).

Students often zero in on a key difference between the two. They note that in a dialogue, participants actively listen to understand each other. In the other kind of discussion, people listen for a break in the conversation to make space for their own voice.

It is easy to make the case to students that listening is hard, and as a culture, we are not very good at it. It is harder to explain how we can get better at it. Naming the classroom an attention gym—as I described in my first post in this series—provides the framework to highlight attention as a key resource in becoming a better listener. Class discussions then become the training ground for workouts in listening.

Continue reading “The Attention Gym II: Stretching to Listen”