As certain core commitments of higher education have come under attack in recent years, I have been paying attention to the potential differences between the public and private spheres. Public institutions in states like Florida and Texas may have little choice but to surrender to the will of the state legislature, which sets budgets and has the power to dictate many of the details as to how its state institutions are run. Legislative control of private institutions is less obvious, but it can still happen—whether directly (as in states like Iowa, which control scholarship programs that can be used at the state’s private institutions) or indirectly (wherein private institutions can be shut out of certain corridors of power if they are seen as unfriendly to a state’s government).
Continue reading “Privilege, Justice, and Religious Freedom”Privilege, Justice, and Religious Freedom
David S. Cunningham examines the tension between public and private higher education institutions in the context of state and federal legislative control. He argues that while private institutions may face less direct oversight, federal grants present significant risks. Religiously affiliated schools may navigate these challenges differently, emphasizing their commitment to social justice and religious freedom.


